AdvertiseDonate
Fort WorthArlingtonIrvingDallasPlanoFriscoGarlandMcKinney
Headlines Blog · 640 Taylor Street, Suite 1200, Fort Worth, TX 76102
Politics · Austin

Texas leaders must lock in midterm results by specific dates

State law requires officials to certify election outcomes within set windows, leaving little room for delay or discretion.

By Thomas Schneider ·

Illustration for: Texas leaders must lock in midterm results by specific dates
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Gov. Greg Abbott and state legislative leaders face fixed deadlines to make the results of the November 3 midterm elections official. The process, known as certification, formally locks in the winners after the initial count is verified. While the step is often quiet and routine, it has drawn closer scrutiny in recent years.

The certification process follows a long history of post-election checks. For the 2020 presidential election, rioters at the U.S. Capitol attempted to halt the certification of results, increasing public attention on the procedure. In Texas, the role of state and local officials in this final stage is largely administrative.

Jonathan Diaz, director of voting advocacy at the Campaign Legal Center, described the duty as mandatory. He noted that certification is a ministerial task under the law, meaning officials do not have discretion to change the outcome. By the time this step occurs, state and local officials have already completed the processes required to confirm the accuracy of the votes.

Joshua Blank, research director of the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin, emphasized that the Texas Election Code uses the word shall rather than may. This language creates a legal obligation for public officials to certify the tabulations. Failing to certify canvassed results would violate the code, which defines it as a felony for someone to knowingly refuse to count valid votes or alter reports to exclude them.

Kenneth Parreno, counsel at Protect Democracy, said the group is monitoring the process closely. He expressed concern that some officials might try to interfere with the elections, citing previous efforts to spread disinformation about voter integrity. However, Parreno noted that the Election Code provides clear requirements that officials must follow, limiting their ability to act outside the law.

Responsibility for certification varies by the type of race. Local canvassing authorities, typically the county commissioners court, handle local elections such as city council and mayor races. Secretary of State Robert Howden tabulates and verifies results for statewide and congressional races. Gov. Abbott then issues the certificate of election for most statewide winners. House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican from Lubbock, will certify the races for governor and lieutenant governor.

Deadlines for these actions are set by state law. Local races must be certified by the 14th day after Election Day, which is November 17. Gov. Abbott and Secretary of State Howden have a window from November 21 to December 7 to act on statewide and congressional results. Speaker Burrows must certify the top two executive races on the first day of the legislative session, which begins January 12, 2027.

A legal challenge has already emerged. On October 27, the Potter County Republican Party filed a lawsuit in the Texas Panhandle. The suit seeks to block certification unless all machine-cast paper ballots are counted by hand. The filing warned of potential issues but did not provide proof to support its claims. Voting rights advocates expect that any efforts to challenge results will likely occur between Election Day and the formal certification of winners.

Some candidates closely aligned with the president may look to past examples, such as the dozens of lawsuits filed in 2020 to contest the defeat of then-President Donald Trump. Diaz said he expects some candidates to try similar legal maneuvers. Despite these potential challenges, advocates remain hopeful that the certification in Texas will be smooth and quick.

Diaz described the ideal outcome as a boring bureaucratic task that few people notice. The process is designed to be a final check rather than a reevaluation of the vote. With deadlines approaching in November and early 2027, the focus turns to whether officials will follow the established legal timeline without delay.

Source: The Texas Tribune

More Politics · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Headlines Blog in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Headlines Blog in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.