AdvertiseDonate
Fort WorthArlingtonIrvingDallasPlanoFriscoGarlandMcKinney
Headlines Blog · 640 Taylor Street, Suite 1200, Fort Worth, TX 76102
Politics · Austin

Vance tests rougher rhetoric in Montana and Kansas

The vice president used profanity at a rally in Topeka, prompting conservative strategists to question whether the tactic feels authentic to voters.

By Thomas Schneider ·

Illustration for: Vance tests rougher rhetoric in Montana and Kansas
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Vice President JD Vance sought a tougher tone in the final stretch of midterm campaigning, but his attempts to appear more casual with profanity drew scrutiny. On Monday, the vice president made two stops, one in Montana and the other in Topeka, Kansas. In both locations, protesters interrupted his speeches. The interruptions set the stage for a test of his new verbal style.

In Montana, Vance referred to the interrupters as a few yahoos. In Topeka, he escalated his language. A protester shouted that he was a war criminal. The crowd chanted USA to drown out the noise. Vance waited for the silence to return before addressing the disruption. He noted that Democrats often interrupt to shut down debates. He claimed that American voters would see through Democratic policies in a free exchange. He called those policies a fat load of bullshit.

Vance continued by calling the specific protester a bullshit artist. He apologized for his language to accommodate the children in the audience. He then dismissed the heckler from the area. This marked a shift from his usual restrained delivery. He had been experimenting with this edgier approach at recent rallies. A Politico report indicated that the strategy has not landed as intended for the vice president.

Conservatives who spoke to Politico described the performance as staged. One prominent commentator, who asked for anonymity, compared Vance to a bad comedian. The commentator suggested that Vance feels the need to signal that he is taking a risk by swearing. They noted that former President Donald Trump curses naturally as part of his speech. The commentator argued that faking authenticity through profanity can be difficult in American politics.

Maura Gillespie, a Republican communications strategist who worked for former House Speaker John Boehner, offered a different perspective. She said swearing can make politicians seem more relatable and passionate. However, she warned that the tactic carries risks. If the language feels scripted, it may backfire. Gillespie expressed concern that inauthenticity would undermine the effect of the profanity.

The vice president's strategy centers on projecting a rawer image to connect with voters. He has used the tactic frequently in the last several weeks. The reaction in Topeka highlights the tension between natural speech and calculated performance. Vance's comments on the nature of Democratic opposition were met with cheers. His self-correction about the children in the crowd added a layer of performance to the moment. The outcome of this rhetorical experiment will be measured in upcoming polls and votes.

Source: HuffPost

More Politics · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Headlines Blog in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Headlines Blog in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.